Screener
HAP vs EART
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.18% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $43M |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +112.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 37.89% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -53.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and EART
Explore further