Screener
RESM vs RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Key differences
- RESM follows a active selection strategy; RECS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RESM | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $5.4B |
| Since | — | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.92% |
| Max drawdown | -8.50% | -34.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RESM and RECS
Explore further