Screener
REVS vs RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Key differences
- RECS is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RECS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $5.4B |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.63% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -34.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and RECS
Explore further