Screener
REW vs IXN
ProShares UltraShort Technology vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.56% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REW covers north america markets; IXN covers global.
- REW follows a inverse strategy; IXN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REW | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 7.20% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -61.2% | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.9% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -39.3% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.17 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.51% | 21.62% |
| Max drawdown | -99.74% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REW and IXN
Explore further