Screener
RNRG vs NANR
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.30% less per year.
- NANR is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNRG is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RNRG covers global markets; NANR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, NANR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNRG | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $795M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.6% | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -58.79% | -49.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNRG and NANR
Explore further