Screener
RNRG vs HAP
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.24% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNRG | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $316M |
| Since | 2015 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.6% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -58.79% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNRG and HAP
Explore further