Screener
ROAM vs EMES
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- ROAM costs 0.21% less per year.
- ROAM is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $11M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.8% | +43.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.76% | 20.75% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and EMES
Explore further