Screener
ROBO vs AFOS
Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF vs ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
Key differences
- AFOS costs 0.50% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than AFOS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROBO covers global markets; AFOS covers north america.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROBO | AFOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $272M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.65% | -11.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROBO and AFOS
Explore further