Screener
ROM vs SEF
ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares Short Financials
Key differences
- ROM is significantly larger than SEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; SEF uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | SEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $961M | $18M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 3.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +141.6% | +0.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.6% | -10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +30.9% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | -0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.47% | 14.40% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -75.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROM and SEF
Explore further