Screener
ROM vs SKF
ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares UltraShort Financials
Key differences
- ROM is significantly larger than SKF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; SKF uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | SKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $961M | $16M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +141.6% | -4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.6% | -25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +30.9% | -16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | -0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.47% | 28.99% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -96.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROM and SKF
Explore further