Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RSMV vs MTUM

Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

RSMV

Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$29M

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$26.7B

Key differences

Both RSMV and MTUM are equity ETFs. RSMV charges 0.95% a year and MTUM 0.15%. The main difference: RSMV follows a active selection strategy; MTUM uses index tracking.

  • RSMV follows a active selection strategy; MTUM uses index tracking.
  • MTUM costs 0.80% less per year.
  • MTUM is much larger than RSMV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MTUM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RSMVMTUM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$29M$26.7B
Since20252013
Dividend yield0.93%0.62%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+20.7%+32.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+32.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+13.7%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.30
Volatility 1Y12.57%20.03%
Max drawdown-17.58%-34.08%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to RSMV and MTUM