Skip to content
Screener

RSPF vs RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$271M

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$9.1B

Key differences

Both RSPF and RWL are equity ETFs. RSPF charges 0.40% a year and RWL 0.39%. The main difference: RWL is much larger than RSPF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • RWL is much larger than RSPF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPFRWL
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$271M$9.1B
Since20062008
Dividend yield1.67%1.24%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+7.8%+28.2%
CAGR 3Y+17.1%+20.3%
CAGR 5Y+6.4%+13.2%
Sharpe 3Y0.811.28
Volatility 1Y15.27%10.16%
Max drawdown-44.80%-36.04%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to RSPF and RWL