Skip to content
Screener

RSPH vs RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

RSPH

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$637M

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$271M

Key differences

Both RSPH and RSPF are equity ETFs. RSPH charges 0.40% a year and RSPF 0.40%. The main difference: Over the last three years, RSPF has delivered higher annualized returns.

  • Over the last three years, RSPF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPHRSPF
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$637M$271M
Since20062006
Dividend yield0.72%1.67%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+11.7%+7.8%
CAGR 3Y+4.7%+17.1%
CAGR 5Y+3.2%+6.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.140.81
Volatility 1Y15.83%15.27%
Max drawdown-30.44%-44.80%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to RSPH and RSPF