Screener
RTH vs IWL
VanEck Retail ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and IWL are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and IWL 0.15%. The main difference: IWL costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWL costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWL is much larger than RTH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.09% | 12.52% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -32.71% |
Similar to RTH and IWL
Explore further