Screener
RTH vs IWN
VanEck Retail ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and IWN are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and IWN 0.24%. The main difference: IWN costs 0.11% less per year.
- IWN costs 0.11% less per year.
- IWN is much larger than RTH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2011 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.09% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -46.08% |
Similar to RTH and IWN
Explore further