Screener
RULE vs TUGN
Adaptive Core ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 1.19% less per year.
- TUGN is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $78M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.4% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.08% | 15.38% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and TUGN
Explore further