Screener
RWK vs GTO
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
RWK is an equity ETF, while GTO is a fixed income ETF. RWK charges 0.39% a year and GTO 0.35%.
- RWK is an equity fund, while GTO is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RWK follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last three years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.68% | 3.43% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -20.75% |
Similar to RWK and GTO
Explore further