Screener
RWK vs PFIG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
RWK is an equity ETF, while PFIG is a fixed income ETF. RWK charges 0.39% a year and PFIG 0.22%.
- RWK is an equity fund, while PFIG is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- PFIG costs 0.17% less per year.
- RWK is much larger than PFIG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $115M |
| Since | 2008 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.68% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -15.73% |
Similar to RWK and PFIG
Explore further