Screener
RWK vs RSPA
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWK is classified as equity, while RSPA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RWK follows a index tracking strategy; RSPA uses option income.
- RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | RSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $748M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 9.12% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.8% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.91% | 9.46% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -15.37% |
Similar to RWK and RSPA
Explore further