Screener
RWL vs CZA
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.30% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.1B | $184M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.11% | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -46.18% |
Similar to RWL and CZA
Explore further