Screener
RWL vs GTOC
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
RWL is an equity ETF, while GTOC is a fixed income ETF. RWL charges 0.39% a year and GTOC 0.26%.
- RWL is an equity fund, while GTOC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RWL follows a index tracking strategy; GTOC uses active selection.
- GTOC costs 0.13% less per year.
- RWL is much larger than GTOC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | GTOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.1B | $183M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -2.70% |
Similar to RWL and GTOC
Explore further