Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RWL vs GTOC

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$9.1B

GTOC

Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$183M

Key differences

RWL is an equity ETF, while GTOC is a fixed income ETF. RWL charges 0.39% a year and GTOC 0.26%.

  • RWL is an equity fund, while GTOC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RWL follows a index tracking strategy; GTOC uses active selection.
  • GTOC costs 0.13% less per year.
  • RWL is much larger than GTOC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RWLGTOC
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.26%
Fund size (AUM)$9.1B$183M
Since20082025
Dividend yield1.24%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+27.5%N/A
CAGR 3Y+21.1%N/A
CAGR 5Y+13.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.33N/A
Volatility 1Y10.11%
Max drawdown-36.04%-2.70%

Similar to RWL and GTOC