Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RWM vs SBB

ProShares Short Russell2000 vs ProShares Short SmallCap600

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$143M

SBB

ProShares Short SmallCap600

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$4M

Key differences

  • RWM is significantly larger than SBB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SBB has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RWMSBB
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$143M$4M
Since20072007
Dividend yield3.99%3.56%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-28.9%-24.0%
CAGR 3Y-13.3%-10.9%
CAGR 5Y-6.2%-5.6%
Sharpe 3Y-0.73-0.62
Volatility 1Y19.17%18.05%
Max drawdown-73.59%-72.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RWM and SBB