Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RWM vs SDD

ProShares Short Russell2000 vs ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$143M

SDD

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

Key differences

  • RWM is significantly larger than SDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, RWM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RWMSDD
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$143M$2M
Since20072007
Dividend yield3.99%6.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-28.9%-45.7%
CAGR 3Y-13.3%-26.2%
CAGR 5Y-6.2%-16.8%
Sharpe 3Y-0.73-0.60
Volatility 1Y19.17%36.30%
Max drawdown-73.59%-96.17%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RWM and SDD