Screener
RZV vs OMFS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- RZV follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RZV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RZV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZV | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $275M |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.87% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -60.42% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZV and OMFS
Explore further