Screener
TWM vs UWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 vs ProShares Ultra Russell2000
Key differences
- UWM is significantly larger than TWM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TWM follows a inverse strategy; UWM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TWM | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $248M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.86% | 0.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -52.8% | +91.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -31.2% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -18.9% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.75 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.52% | 38.22% |
| Max drawdown | -96.59% | -71.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TWM and UWM
Explore further