Screener
SAGP vs EPP
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EPP costs 0.18% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; EPP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SAGP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 14.53% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -39.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and EPP
Explore further