Screener
SAGP vs IPAC
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.56% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and IPAC
Explore further