Screener
SAGP vs EWJ
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
- EWJ costs 0.16% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP covers global markets; EWJ covers asia pacific.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; EWJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $21.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 4.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 19.81% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -33.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and EWJ
Explore further