Screener
SAGP vs SCJ
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.15% less per year.
- SCJ is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP covers global markets; SCJ covers asia pacific.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $235M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and SCJ
Explore further