Screener
SBB vs SAA
ProShares Short SmallCap600 vs ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
Key differences
- SAA is significantly larger than SBB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBB follows a inverse strategy; SAA uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, SAA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBB | SAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $27M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -22.1% | +61.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.4% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.9% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.59 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.01% | 36.13% |
| Max drawdown | -72.70% | -74.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBB and SAA
Explore further