Screener
SETM vs COPJ
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SETM costs 0.10% less per year.
- SETM is significantly larger than COPJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, COPJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | COPJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $162M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 11.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +125.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +43.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 41.67% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -32.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and COPJ
Explore further