Screener
SETM vs MXI
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs iShares Global Materials ETF
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.26% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | MXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $325M |
| Since | 2023 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +33.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 19.47% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and MXI
Explore further