Screener
SETM vs PICK
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Key differences
- PICK costs 0.26% less per year.
- PICK is significantly larger than SETM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PICK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 2.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +83.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 27.81% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -52.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and PICK
Explore further