Screener
SETM vs SLVP
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP costs 0.26% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $945M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +133.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +51.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 52.96% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -62.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and SLVP
Explore further