Screener
SMCO vs FNDA
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.30% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- FNDA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 17.08% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -44.64% |
Similar to SMCO and FNDA
Explore further