Screener
SMH vs ESPO
VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.20% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMH | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58.8B | $257M |
| Since | 2011 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +151.6% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +65.4% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +39.4% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.52 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.57% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -45.30% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMH and ESPO
Explore further