Screener
SMMU vs BOND
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- SMMU costs 0.19% less per year.
- BOND is significantly larger than SMMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMMU follows a index tracking strategy; BOND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BOND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMMU | BOND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $7.9B |
| Since | 2010 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 5.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.9% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.5% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.03% | 4.00% |
| Max drawdown | -5.09% | -19.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMMU and BOND
Explore further