Screener
SMMU vs EMNT
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- EMNT costs 0.11% less per year.
- SMMU is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMNT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMMU | EMNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $207M |
| Since | 2010 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 4.12% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.8% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 2.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.03% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -5.09% | -2.28% |
Similar to SMMU and EMNT
Explore further