Screener
SMMU vs MINT
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINT is significantly larger than SMMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMMU follows a index tracking strategy; MINT uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MINT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMMU | MINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $15.5B |
| Since | 2010 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.9% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.5% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | 4.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.03% | 0.27% |
| Max drawdown | -5.09% | -4.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMMU and MINT
Explore further