Screener
SMN vs MXI
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs iShares Global Materials ETF
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.56% less per year.
- MXI is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMN covers north america markets; MXI covers global.
- SMN follows a inverse strategy; MXI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | MXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $325M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | +33.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.9% | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.14% | 19.47% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMN and MXI
Explore further