Screener
SMOG vs NLR
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.12% less per year.
- NLR is significantly larger than SMOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMOG covers global markets; NLR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, NLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $5.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 41.97% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and NLR
Explore further