Screener
SPAM vs IWL
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -32.71% |
Similar to SPAM and IWL
Explore further