Screener
SUB vs HIMU
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.32% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than HIMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.1% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.00% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUB and HIMU
Explore further