Screener
TAN vs IMFL
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.36% less per year.
- TAN follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $957M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | 15.80% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -33.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and IMFL
Explore further