Screener
TAN vs PBW
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PBW costs 0.06% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PBW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $447M |
| Since | 2008 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and PBW
Explore further