Screener
THNQ vs CWS
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- THNQ follows a index tracking strategy; CWS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| THNQ | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $322M | $155M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.0% | +1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.5% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.07% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -50.56% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THNQ and CWS
Explore further