Screener
TINT vs GBUG
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.32% less per year.
- GBUG is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TINT follows a index tracking strategy; GBUG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| TINT | GBUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $164M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.2% | +74.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.73% | 47.45% |
| Max drawdown | -41.29% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TINT and GBUG
Explore further