Screener
TINT vs SETM
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.07% less per year.
- SETM is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TINT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $617M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.2% | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.73% | 44.37% |
| Max drawdown | -41.29% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TINT and SETM
Explore further