Screener
TINT vs METL
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.41% less per year.
- METL is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TINT follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| TINT | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $95M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.73% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.29% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TINT and METL
Explore further