Screener
TINT vs UYM
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs ProShares Ultra Materials
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.37% less per year.
- UYM is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TINT follows a index tracking strategy; UYM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- UYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TINT | UYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $41M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 1.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.2% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.73% | 33.86% |
| Max drawdown | -41.29% | -73.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TINT and UYM
Explore further